pe antihuman ul16 binding protein 1 Search Results


94
R&D Systems anti human ulbp monoclonal antibodies
Figure 1. Expression of NKG2D ligands by renal proximal tubular epithelial cell. (A) Surface and intracellular staining of NKG2D ligand proteins. Human renal proximal TECs (HK-2) were stained with control normal mouse immunoglobulin G (iso) or anti-MICA, and <t>anti-ULBP1,</t> 2 or 3 antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry. In the histograms, the gray peak represents the unstained control. (B) TGF-β-induced expression of NKG2D ligands. Renal proximal TECs (HK-2) were incubated in the presence of TGF-β (500 pg/ml) for 48 h, and surface and intracellular expression of NKG2D ligands were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results are representative of three independent experiments. NKG2D, NK group 2 member D; TECs, tubular epithelial cells; MICA, major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain molecules A; <t>ULBP,</t> UL16‑binding proteins; TGF, transforming growth factor.
Anti Human Ulbp Monoclonal Antibodies, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti human ulbp monoclonal antibodies/product/R&D Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human ulbp monoclonal antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher gene exp ulbp1 mm01180648 m1
Figure 1. Expression of NKG2D ligands by renal proximal tubular epithelial cell. (A) Surface and intracellular staining of NKG2D ligand proteins. Human renal proximal TECs (HK-2) were stained with control normal mouse immunoglobulin G (iso) or anti-MICA, and <t>anti-ULBP1,</t> 2 or 3 antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry. In the histograms, the gray peak represents the unstained control. (B) TGF-β-induced expression of NKG2D ligands. Renal proximal TECs (HK-2) were incubated in the presence of TGF-β (500 pg/ml) for 48 h, and surface and intracellular expression of NKG2D ligands were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results are representative of three independent experiments. NKG2D, NK group 2 member D; TECs, tubular epithelial cells; MICA, major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain molecules A; <t>ULBP,</t> UL16‑binding proteins; TGF, transforming growth factor.
Gene Exp Ulbp1 Mm01180648 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp ulbp1 mm01180648 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene exp ulbp1 mm01180648 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems mouse antihuman ulbp1 antibody
Figure 1. Expression of NKG2D ligands by renal proximal tubular epithelial cell. (A) Surface and intracellular staining of NKG2D ligand proteins. Human renal proximal TECs (HK-2) were stained with control normal mouse immunoglobulin G (iso) or anti-MICA, and <t>anti-ULBP1,</t> 2 or 3 antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry. In the histograms, the gray peak represents the unstained control. (B) TGF-β-induced expression of NKG2D ligands. Renal proximal TECs (HK-2) were incubated in the presence of TGF-β (500 pg/ml) for 48 h, and surface and intracellular expression of NKG2D ligands were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results are representative of three independent experiments. NKG2D, NK group 2 member D; TECs, tubular epithelial cells; MICA, major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain molecules A; <t>ULBP,</t> UL16‑binding proteins; TGF, transforming growth factor.
Mouse Antihuman Ulbp1 Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse antihuman ulbp1 antibody/product/R&D Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse antihuman ulbp1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Amgen anti-ulbp1 (clone m295, igg1)
Figure 1. Expression of NKG2D ligands by renal proximal tubular epithelial cell. (A) Surface and intracellular staining of NKG2D ligand proteins. Human renal proximal TECs (HK-2) were stained with control normal mouse immunoglobulin G (iso) or anti-MICA, and <t>anti-ULBP1,</t> 2 or 3 antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry. In the histograms, the gray peak represents the unstained control. (B) TGF-β-induced expression of NKG2D ligands. Renal proximal TECs (HK-2) were incubated in the presence of TGF-β (500 pg/ml) for 48 h, and surface and intracellular expression of NKG2D ligands were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results are representative of three independent experiments. NKG2D, NK group 2 member D; TECs, tubular epithelial cells; MICA, major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain molecules A; <t>ULBP,</t> UL16‑binding proteins; TGF, transforming growth factor.
Anti Ulbp1 (Clone M295, Igg1), supplied by Amgen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-ulbp1 (clone m295, igg1)/product/Amgen
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-ulbp1 (clone m295, igg1) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology antibodies against ulbp1
Figure 2. Expression levels of <t>ULBP1</t> in placentas from pregnant women with PE and women with NP were determined by RT‑qPCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry analysis. (A) RT‑qPCR analysis of ULBP1 mRNA expression levels in placentas from PE and NP women (n=30 for each group). (B) Western blot analysis of ULBP1 protein expression in placentas from PE and NP women. Upper panel, a typical result of western blotting; lower panel, bar chart according to the statistical analysis based on the result of three independently repeated experiments (n=30 for each group). (C) Immunostaining of ULBP1 in placentas from PE and NP women. Data are presented as the mean + standard error of the mean. Left panel, PE; middle panel, NP; right panel, negative control; scale bars, 200 µm. *P<0.05, PE vs. NP. ULBP1, unique long 16 binding protein 1; PE, preeclampsia; NP, normal pregnancy; RT‑qPCR, reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Antibodies Against Ulbp1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against ulbp1/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against ulbp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Thermo Fisher gene exp ulbp1 hs00360941 m1
Figure 2. Expression levels of <t>ULBP1</t> in placentas from pregnant women with PE and women with NP were determined by RT‑qPCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry analysis. (A) RT‑qPCR analysis of ULBP1 mRNA expression levels in placentas from PE and NP women (n=30 for each group). (B) Western blot analysis of ULBP1 protein expression in placentas from PE and NP women. Upper panel, a typical result of western blotting; lower panel, bar chart according to the statistical analysis based on the result of three independently repeated experiments (n=30 for each group). (C) Immunostaining of ULBP1 in placentas from PE and NP women. Data are presented as the mean + standard error of the mean. Left panel, PE; middle panel, NP; right panel, negative control; scale bars, 200 µm. *P<0.05, PE vs. NP. ULBP1, unique long 16 binding protein 1; PE, preeclampsia; NP, normal pregnancy; RT‑qPCR, reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Gene Exp Ulbp1 Hs00360941 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp ulbp1 hs00360941 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene exp ulbp1 hs00360941 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher ulbp1 rt-qpcr primer-probe kit
SARS-CoV-2 post-transcriptionally downregulates NKG2D-L and does not induce shedding or degradation (A) Boxplots showing the delta CT values of several genes in mock and SARS-CoV-2-infected A549-ACE2s as measured by qRT-PCR. N encodes SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein. MICA, MICB, <t>ULBP1,</t> and ULBP2 encode ligands for NKG2D. Each point represents the mean of three qPCR technical replicates. (B) Bar plot showing the fold change in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of NKG2D-L in SARS-CoV-2-infected A549-ACE2 compared with mock-infected cells after treatment with PBS (left), proteasome inhibitor MG-132 (middle), or lysosomal inhibitor BAF-A1 (right). Inhibitors were added 24 h after infection and NKG2D-L expression was measured by flow cytometry at 48 h post-infection. Bar plots represent mean values of three technical replicates ± standard deviations. (C) Absorbance values of neat supernatants from mock or SARS-CoV-2-infected cultures at varying dilutions as measured by plate-based ELISAs for soluble MICA (sMICA) and soluble ULBP2 (sUPBP2). Absorbance values were calculated by subtracting absorbance readings taken at 560 nm from those taken at 450 in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Horizontal lines indicate limits of detection (dashed, sMICA; solid, sULBP2). Bar plots represent the means of four technical replicates for each condition ± standard deviations. Significance values in (A and B) were calculated using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test with the Bonferroni correction for multiple hypothesis testing.
Ulbp1 Rt Qpcr Primer Probe Kit, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ulbp1 rt-qpcr primer-probe kit/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ulbp1 rt-qpcr primer-probe kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems anti human ulbp1
List of primers used in qRT-PCR.
Anti Human Ulbp1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti human ulbp1/product/R&D Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human ulbp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
R&D Systems ulbp1
List of primers used in qRT-PCR.
Ulbp1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ulbp1/product/R&D Systems
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ulbp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems pe conjugated nkg2d ligands
A Diagrammatic sketch of in situ binding kinetic assay and functionalization of RBC. B Representative adhesion frequency ( P a ) versus contact duration ( t c ) curves for <t>NKG2D</t> expressing NK cells ( n ≥ 3) in contact with RBCs ( n ≥ 3) coated with a ligand (MICA in red, MICB in orange, <t>ULBP1</t> in green, or <t>ULBP3</t> in blue) at different contact durations, fitted by a non‐linear in situ binding‐kinetic model (Huang et al , ). Site densities of NKG2D ( m r ) and its ligands ( m l ) are indicated. C–E In situ force‐free affinities (C), on‐rates (D), and off‐rates (E) of NKG2D binding with indicated ligands from mammalian cells. The in situ force‐free kinetics were obtained from fittings with an in situ binding‐kinetic model in (B). F Detection range comparison in affinity measurement of NKG2D and indicated ligands between in situ and in‐solution assay. Bars in different colors are the ratios of the affinities of indicated ligands divided by that of ULBP1. Data information: In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from E. coli were from previous study (McFarland & Strong, ). In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from mammalian cells were measured by BLI (Fig ). Every dot in (C–E) represents one independent binding experiment. Error bars in (B‐E) are mean ± SEM for at least three independent biological experiments where * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.
Pe Conjugated Nkg2d Ligands, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pe conjugated nkg2d ligands/product/R&D Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pe conjugated nkg2d ligands - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems antibodies against ulbp1
A Diagrammatic sketch of in situ binding kinetic assay and functionalization of RBC. B Representative adhesion frequency ( P a ) versus contact duration ( t c ) curves for <t>NKG2D</t> expressing NK cells ( n ≥ 3) in contact with RBCs ( n ≥ 3) coated with a ligand (MICA in red, MICB in orange, <t>ULBP1</t> in green, or <t>ULBP3</t> in blue) at different contact durations, fitted by a non‐linear in situ binding‐kinetic model (Huang et al , ). Site densities of NKG2D ( m r ) and its ligands ( m l ) are indicated. C–E In situ force‐free affinities (C), on‐rates (D), and off‐rates (E) of NKG2D binding with indicated ligands from mammalian cells. The in situ force‐free kinetics were obtained from fittings with an in situ binding‐kinetic model in (B). F Detection range comparison in affinity measurement of NKG2D and indicated ligands between in situ and in‐solution assay. Bars in different colors are the ratios of the affinities of indicated ligands divided by that of ULBP1. Data information: In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from E. coli were from previous study (McFarland & Strong, ). In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from mammalian cells were measured by BLI (Fig ). Every dot in (C–E) represents one independent binding experiment. Error bars in (B‐E) are mean ± SEM for at least three independent biological experiments where * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.
Antibodies Against Ulbp1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against ulbp1/product/R&D Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against ulbp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 1. Expression of NKG2D ligands by renal proximal tubular epithelial cell. (A) Surface and intracellular staining of NKG2D ligand proteins. Human renal proximal TECs (HK-2) were stained with control normal mouse immunoglobulin G (iso) or anti-MICA, and anti-ULBP1, 2 or 3 antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry. In the histograms, the gray peak represents the unstained control. (B) TGF-β-induced expression of NKG2D ligands. Renal proximal TECs (HK-2) were incubated in the presence of TGF-β (500 pg/ml) for 48 h, and surface and intracellular expression of NKG2D ligands were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results are representative of three independent experiments. NKG2D, NK group 2 member D; TECs, tubular epithelial cells; MICA, major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain molecules A; ULBP, UL16‑binding proteins; TGF, transforming growth factor.

Journal: International journal of molecular medicine

Article Title: Transforming growth factor-β1 regulates human renal proximal tubular epithelial cell susceptibility to natural killer cells via modulation of the NKG2D ligands.

doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2317

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. Expression of NKG2D ligands by renal proximal tubular epithelial cell. (A) Surface and intracellular staining of NKG2D ligand proteins. Human renal proximal TECs (HK-2) were stained with control normal mouse immunoglobulin G (iso) or anti-MICA, and anti-ULBP1, 2 or 3 antibodies, and analyzed by flow cytometry. In the histograms, the gray peak represents the unstained control. (B) TGF-β-induced expression of NKG2D ligands. Renal proximal TECs (HK-2) were incubated in the presence of TGF-β (500 pg/ml) for 48 h, and surface and intracellular expression of NKG2D ligands were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results are representative of three independent experiments. NKG2D, NK group 2 member D; TECs, tubular epithelial cells; MICA, major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain molecules A; ULBP, UL16‑binding proteins; TGF, transforming growth factor.

Article Snippet: Cells were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and incubated with mouse anti-MICA antibody (#MAB13001) or anti-human ULBP monoclonal antibodies [anti-ULBP1 (#MAB1380), anti-ULBP2 (#MAB1298) and anti-ULBP3 (#MAB1517); R&D Systems} for 30 min on ice.

Techniques: Expressing, Staining, Control, Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Immunopeptidomics

Figure 2. Expression levels of ULBP1 in placentas from pregnant women with PE and women with NP were determined by RT‑qPCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry analysis. (A) RT‑qPCR analysis of ULBP1 mRNA expression levels in placentas from PE and NP women (n=30 for each group). (B) Western blot analysis of ULBP1 protein expression in placentas from PE and NP women. Upper panel, a typical result of western blotting; lower panel, bar chart according to the statistical analysis based on the result of three independently repeated experiments (n=30 for each group). (C) Immunostaining of ULBP1 in placentas from PE and NP women. Data are presented as the mean + standard error of the mean. Left panel, PE; middle panel, NP; right panel, negative control; scale bars, 200 µm. *P<0.05, PE vs. NP. ULBP1, unique long 16 binding protein 1; PE, preeclampsia; NP, normal pregnancy; RT‑qPCR, reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Journal: Experimental and therapeutic medicine

Article Title: Upregulated unique long 16 binding protein 1 detected in preeclamptic placenta affects human extravillous trophoblast cell line (HTR-8/SVneo) invasion by modulating the function of uterine natural killer cells.

doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4143

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. Expression levels of ULBP1 in placentas from pregnant women with PE and women with NP were determined by RT‑qPCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry analysis. (A) RT‑qPCR analysis of ULBP1 mRNA expression levels in placentas from PE and NP women (n=30 for each group). (B) Western blot analysis of ULBP1 protein expression in placentas from PE and NP women. Upper panel, a typical result of western blotting; lower panel, bar chart according to the statistical analysis based on the result of three independently repeated experiments (n=30 for each group). (C) Immunostaining of ULBP1 in placentas from PE and NP women. Data are presented as the mean + standard error of the mean. Left panel, PE; middle panel, NP; right panel, negative control; scale bars, 200 µm. *P<0.05, PE vs. NP. ULBP1, unique long 16 binding protein 1; PE, preeclampsia; NP, normal pregnancy; RT‑qPCR, reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Article Snippet: Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature with TBST (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20, pH 7.0) containing 5% nonfat dry milk and incubated with primary antibodies against ULBP1 (1:200; sc-33456; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and β-actin (1:8,000; 66009-1; Proteintech Group, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) overnight at 4 ̊C.

Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Immunohistochemistry, Immunostaining, Negative Control, Binding Assay, Polymerase Chain Reaction

Figure 3. uNK cell supernatants cultured with ULBP1 inhibited HTR‑8/SVneo cell invasion. (A) Representative images of invaded cells cultured with different CM in the Transwell invasion assay. Upper panel, the CM is uNK cell supernatants cultured with ULBP1; lower panel, the CM is uNK cell supernatants cultured without ULBP1; scale bars, 200 µm. Cells were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (magnification, x100). (B) Statistical bar graphs exhibiting the effect of uNK cell supernatants cultured with or without ULBP1 on the invasion of HTR‑8/SVneo cells in a Transwell invasion assay. Data are expressed as invasion index (n=10 in duplicate). (C) Statistical bar graphs exhibiting the effect of the addition of IFN‑γ neutralizing Ab to the uNK cell supernatants cultured with ULBP1 on invasion of HTR‑8/SVneo cells in a Transwell invasion assay (n=10 in duplicate). (D) Statistical bar graphs exhibiting the effect of the addition of IL‑8 neutralizing Ab to the uNK cell supernatants cultured with ULBP1 on invasion of HTR‑8/SVneo cells in a Transwell invasion assay (n=10 in duplicate). Data are presented as the mean + standard error of the mean. *P<0.05. uNK, uterine natural killer; ULBP1, unique long 16 binding protein 1; HTR‑8/SVneo, extravillous trophoblast cell line; IFN, interferon; Ab, antibody; IL, interleukin; CM, condition medium.

Journal: Experimental and therapeutic medicine

Article Title: Upregulated unique long 16 binding protein 1 detected in preeclamptic placenta affects human extravillous trophoblast cell line (HTR-8/SVneo) invasion by modulating the function of uterine natural killer cells.

doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4143

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. uNK cell supernatants cultured with ULBP1 inhibited HTR‑8/SVneo cell invasion. (A) Representative images of invaded cells cultured with different CM in the Transwell invasion assay. Upper panel, the CM is uNK cell supernatants cultured with ULBP1; lower panel, the CM is uNK cell supernatants cultured without ULBP1; scale bars, 200 µm. Cells were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (magnification, x100). (B) Statistical bar graphs exhibiting the effect of uNK cell supernatants cultured with or without ULBP1 on the invasion of HTR‑8/SVneo cells in a Transwell invasion assay. Data are expressed as invasion index (n=10 in duplicate). (C) Statistical bar graphs exhibiting the effect of the addition of IFN‑γ neutralizing Ab to the uNK cell supernatants cultured with ULBP1 on invasion of HTR‑8/SVneo cells in a Transwell invasion assay (n=10 in duplicate). (D) Statistical bar graphs exhibiting the effect of the addition of IL‑8 neutralizing Ab to the uNK cell supernatants cultured with ULBP1 on invasion of HTR‑8/SVneo cells in a Transwell invasion assay (n=10 in duplicate). Data are presented as the mean + standard error of the mean. *P<0.05. uNK, uterine natural killer; ULBP1, unique long 16 binding protein 1; HTR‑8/SVneo, extravillous trophoblast cell line; IFN, interferon; Ab, antibody; IL, interleukin; CM, condition medium.

Article Snippet: Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature with TBST (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20, pH 7.0) containing 5% nonfat dry milk and incubated with primary antibodies against ULBP1 (1:200; sc-33456; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and β-actin (1:8,000; 66009-1; Proteintech Group, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) overnight at 4 ̊C.

Techniques: Cell Culture, Transwell Invasion Assay, Staining, Binding Assay

SARS-CoV-2 post-transcriptionally downregulates NKG2D-L and does not induce shedding or degradation (A) Boxplots showing the delta CT values of several genes in mock and SARS-CoV-2-infected A549-ACE2s as measured by qRT-PCR. N encodes SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein. MICA, MICB, ULBP1, and ULBP2 encode ligands for NKG2D. Each point represents the mean of three qPCR technical replicates. (B) Bar plot showing the fold change in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of NKG2D-L in SARS-CoV-2-infected A549-ACE2 compared with mock-infected cells after treatment with PBS (left), proteasome inhibitor MG-132 (middle), or lysosomal inhibitor BAF-A1 (right). Inhibitors were added 24 h after infection and NKG2D-L expression was measured by flow cytometry at 48 h post-infection. Bar plots represent mean values of three technical replicates ± standard deviations. (C) Absorbance values of neat supernatants from mock or SARS-CoV-2-infected cultures at varying dilutions as measured by plate-based ELISAs for soluble MICA (sMICA) and soluble ULBP2 (sUPBP2). Absorbance values were calculated by subtracting absorbance readings taken at 560 nm from those taken at 450 in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Horizontal lines indicate limits of detection (dashed, sMICA; solid, sULBP2). Bar plots represent the means of four technical replicates for each condition ± standard deviations. Significance values in (A and B) were calculated using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test with the Bonferroni correction for multiple hypothesis testing.

Journal: Cell Reports

Article Title: SARS-CoV-2 escapes direct NK cell killing through Nsp1-mediated downregulation of ligands for NKG2D

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111892

Figure Lengend Snippet: SARS-CoV-2 post-transcriptionally downregulates NKG2D-L and does not induce shedding or degradation (A) Boxplots showing the delta CT values of several genes in mock and SARS-CoV-2-infected A549-ACE2s as measured by qRT-PCR. N encodes SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein. MICA, MICB, ULBP1, and ULBP2 encode ligands for NKG2D. Each point represents the mean of three qPCR technical replicates. (B) Bar plot showing the fold change in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of NKG2D-L in SARS-CoV-2-infected A549-ACE2 compared with mock-infected cells after treatment with PBS (left), proteasome inhibitor MG-132 (middle), or lysosomal inhibitor BAF-A1 (right). Inhibitors were added 24 h after infection and NKG2D-L expression was measured by flow cytometry at 48 h post-infection. Bar plots represent mean values of three technical replicates ± standard deviations. (C) Absorbance values of neat supernatants from mock or SARS-CoV-2-infected cultures at varying dilutions as measured by plate-based ELISAs for soluble MICA (sMICA) and soluble ULBP2 (sUPBP2). Absorbance values were calculated by subtracting absorbance readings taken at 560 nm from those taken at 450 in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Horizontal lines indicate limits of detection (dashed, sMICA; solid, sULBP2). Bar plots represent the means of four technical replicates for each condition ± standard deviations. Significance values in (A and B) were calculated using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test with the Bonferroni correction for multiple hypothesis testing.

Article Snippet: ULBP1 RT-qPCR primer-probe kit , ThermoFisher Scientific , Assay ID: Hs0036941_m1.

Techniques: Infection, Quantitative RT-PCR, Fluorescence, Expressing, Flow Cytometry

Journal: Cell Reports

Article Title: SARS-CoV-2 escapes direct NK cell killing through Nsp1-mediated downregulation of ligands for NKG2D

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111892

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: ULBP1 RT-qPCR primer-probe kit , ThermoFisher Scientific , Assay ID: Hs0036941_m1.

Techniques: Virus, Recombinant, Electron Microscopy, Cell Isolation, Quantitative RT-PCR, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Control, Plasmid Preparation, Software

List of primers used in qRT-PCR.

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

Article Title: Low-Dose Gemcitabine Treatment Enhances Immunogenicity and Natural Killer Cell-Driven Tumor Immunity in Lung Cancer

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00331

Figure Lengend Snippet: List of primers used in qRT-PCR.

Article Snippet: Anti-human ULBP1, ULBP2/5/6, and ULBP3 antibody were purchased from R&D Systems.

Techniques:

Gemcitabine up-regulates NKG2D ligands in lung cancer cells. (A) qRT-PCR of H60, Raet-1 , and Ulbp1 mRNA in LLC cells. (B) qRT-PCR of major histocompatibility complex class I polypeptide-related sequence A ( MICA ), MICB , and UL16 binding protein ( ULBP ) 1-6 mRNA in A549 cells. Data are the fold-change of mRNA expression in gemcitabine- and cisplatin-treated cells relative to untreated cells. (C) Surface expression of MICA/B, ULBP1, ULBP2/5/6, and ULBP3 was measured by flow cytometry on A549 cells treated with vehicle control (DMSO), gemcitabine or cisplatin. Data are representative of three independent experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

Article Title: Low-Dose Gemcitabine Treatment Enhances Immunogenicity and Natural Killer Cell-Driven Tumor Immunity in Lung Cancer

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00331

Figure Lengend Snippet: Gemcitabine up-regulates NKG2D ligands in lung cancer cells. (A) qRT-PCR of H60, Raet-1 , and Ulbp1 mRNA in LLC cells. (B) qRT-PCR of major histocompatibility complex class I polypeptide-related sequence A ( MICA ), MICB , and UL16 binding protein ( ULBP ) 1-6 mRNA in A549 cells. Data are the fold-change of mRNA expression in gemcitabine- and cisplatin-treated cells relative to untreated cells. (C) Surface expression of MICA/B, ULBP1, ULBP2/5/6, and ULBP3 was measured by flow cytometry on A549 cells treated with vehicle control (DMSO), gemcitabine or cisplatin. Data are representative of three independent experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Anti-human ULBP1, ULBP2/5/6, and ULBP3 antibody were purchased from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Immunopeptidomics, Sequencing, Binding Assay, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Control

A Diagrammatic sketch of in situ binding kinetic assay and functionalization of RBC. B Representative adhesion frequency ( P a ) versus contact duration ( t c ) curves for NKG2D expressing NK cells ( n ≥ 3) in contact with RBCs ( n ≥ 3) coated with a ligand (MICA in red, MICB in orange, ULBP1 in green, or ULBP3 in blue) at different contact durations, fitted by a non‐linear in situ binding‐kinetic model (Huang et al , ). Site densities of NKG2D ( m r ) and its ligands ( m l ) are indicated. C–E In situ force‐free affinities (C), on‐rates (D), and off‐rates (E) of NKG2D binding with indicated ligands from mammalian cells. The in situ force‐free kinetics were obtained from fittings with an in situ binding‐kinetic model in (B). F Detection range comparison in affinity measurement of NKG2D and indicated ligands between in situ and in‐solution assay. Bars in different colors are the ratios of the affinities of indicated ligands divided by that of ULBP1. Data information: In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from E. coli were from previous study (McFarland & Strong, ). In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from mammalian cells were measured by BLI (Fig ). Every dot in (C–E) represents one independent binding experiment. Error bars in (B‐E) are mean ± SEM for at least three independent biological experiments where * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Diagrammatic sketch of in situ binding kinetic assay and functionalization of RBC. B Representative adhesion frequency ( P a ) versus contact duration ( t c ) curves for NKG2D expressing NK cells ( n ≥ 3) in contact with RBCs ( n ≥ 3) coated with a ligand (MICA in red, MICB in orange, ULBP1 in green, or ULBP3 in blue) at different contact durations, fitted by a non‐linear in situ binding‐kinetic model (Huang et al , ). Site densities of NKG2D ( m r ) and its ligands ( m l ) are indicated. C–E In situ force‐free affinities (C), on‐rates (D), and off‐rates (E) of NKG2D binding with indicated ligands from mammalian cells. The in situ force‐free kinetics were obtained from fittings with an in situ binding‐kinetic model in (B). F Detection range comparison in affinity measurement of NKG2D and indicated ligands between in situ and in‐solution assay. Bars in different colors are the ratios of the affinities of indicated ligands divided by that of ULBP1. Data information: In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from E. coli were from previous study (McFarland & Strong, ). In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from mammalian cells were measured by BLI (Fig ). Every dot in (C–E) represents one independent binding experiment. Error bars in (B‐E) are mean ± SEM for at least three independent biological experiments where * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: In Situ, Binding Assay, Kinetic Assay, Expressing, Comparison, Purification, Two Tailed Test

A Photomicrographs of micropipette adhesion frequency assay in which NK cell controlled by a micropipette approach, contact, detach with RBC with/without adhesion as marked. Scale bars in (A) represent 5 μm. B–G Flow cytometry analysis of NKG2D and ligands by specific antibodies along with four standard calibration beads (Gray histogram means isotype control, histogram of other colors means sample). NKG2D ligands purified from 293F cells were biotinylated linked to the membrane of SA‐coated human RBC cells. MICA‐linked (B), MICB‐linked (C), ULBP1‐linked (D), and ULBP3‐linked (E) RBC cells were incubated with PE‐labeled primary monoclonal antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled primary mAb of NKG2D and analyzed by flow cytometry (F). PE standard calibration beads were analyzed along with the isotype control for nonspecific binding (G). H A calibration curve of log of PE molecules/bead (provided by the manufacturer) versus log of measured fluorescence intensity PE‐A was plotted based on data of four standard beads (filled circles). The site density of MICA on RBC was calculated by comparing the log of fluorescence intensity of the sample (open square) with the calibration curve after subtracting negative control fluorescence intensity. I–O BLI binding curves of NKG2D receptor at serious concentrations with immobilized MICA (I), MICB (J), ULBP1 (K), and ULBP3 (L) and the corresponding binding affinities (M), on‐rates (N), and off‐rates (O) derived from BLI experiments. Concentrations of NKG2D were 200, 100, 50, 25 and 12.5 nM labeled from dark color to light color. Error bars in (M–O) represent mean ± SEM for biological triplicate experiments.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Photomicrographs of micropipette adhesion frequency assay in which NK cell controlled by a micropipette approach, contact, detach with RBC with/without adhesion as marked. Scale bars in (A) represent 5 μm. B–G Flow cytometry analysis of NKG2D and ligands by specific antibodies along with four standard calibration beads (Gray histogram means isotype control, histogram of other colors means sample). NKG2D ligands purified from 293F cells were biotinylated linked to the membrane of SA‐coated human RBC cells. MICA‐linked (B), MICB‐linked (C), ULBP1‐linked (D), and ULBP3‐linked (E) RBC cells were incubated with PE‐labeled primary monoclonal antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled primary mAb of NKG2D and analyzed by flow cytometry (F). PE standard calibration beads were analyzed along with the isotype control for nonspecific binding (G). H A calibration curve of log of PE molecules/bead (provided by the manufacturer) versus log of measured fluorescence intensity PE‐A was plotted based on data of four standard beads (filled circles). The site density of MICA on RBC was calculated by comparing the log of fluorescence intensity of the sample (open square) with the calibration curve after subtracting negative control fluorescence intensity. I–O BLI binding curves of NKG2D receptor at serious concentrations with immobilized MICA (I), MICB (J), ULBP1 (K), and ULBP3 (L) and the corresponding binding affinities (M), on‐rates (N), and off‐rates (O) derived from BLI experiments. Concentrations of NKG2D were 200, 100, 50, 25 and 12.5 nM labeled from dark color to light color. Error bars in (M–O) represent mean ± SEM for biological triplicate experiments.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Purification, Membrane, Incubation, Labeling, Binding Assay, Fluorescence, Negative Control, Derivative Assay

A–C Schematic diagram (A) of IFN‐γ release assay and IFN‐γ production (B) by human peripheral NK cells stimulated with plate‐coated NKG2D ligands (MICA in red, MICB in green and ULBP3 in blue) assessed by Cytometric Bead Array, of which are their half‐maximal effective concentration (EC 50 ) (C). D–F Plots of reciprocals of EC 50 versus the effective in situ affinities ( A c K a ) (D), the effective in situ on‐rate ( A c K on ) (E) and in situ off‐rate ( k off ) (F). Data information: The IFN‐γ release assay in (B) was one representative experiment of three total independent experiments. Data points in (B) and bars in (C) represent mean values. Error bars in (B) and (C) represent mean ± SEM. *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A–C Schematic diagram (A) of IFN‐γ release assay and IFN‐γ production (B) by human peripheral NK cells stimulated with plate‐coated NKG2D ligands (MICA in red, MICB in green and ULBP3 in blue) assessed by Cytometric Bead Array, of which are their half‐maximal effective concentration (EC 50 ) (C). D–F Plots of reciprocals of EC 50 versus the effective in situ affinities ( A c K a ) (D), the effective in situ on‐rate ( A c K on ) (E) and in situ off‐rate ( k off ) (F). Data information: The IFN‐γ release assay in (B) was one representative experiment of three total independent experiments. Data points in (B) and bars in (C) represent mean values. Error bars in (B) and (C) represent mean ± SEM. *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Release Assay, Concentration Assay, In Situ, Two Tailed Test

A, B Flow cytometry analysis of the percentages of CD107a + (A) cells pERK + cells (B) under stimulation of different NKG2D ligands (MICA in red, MICB in orange, ULBLP3 in blue) compared with SA negative control (gray). C, D Corresponding quantification of percentages of CD107a + cells and pERK + NK cells in (A) and (B). E, F Plots and Pearson correlation analysis of NKG2D ligands stimulated percentages of CD107a + (E) and pERK + (F) NK cells with their reciprocals of EC 50 to release IFN‐γ. G IFN‐γ release (one representative experiment of total three independent biological experiments) of periphery human NK cells under the stimulation of soluble NKG2D ligands at 100 nM. Data information: Every dot in (C) and (D) represents one independent biological experiment. Data are mean ± SEM for biological triplicate experiments. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test).

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A, B Flow cytometry analysis of the percentages of CD107a + (A) cells pERK + cells (B) under stimulation of different NKG2D ligands (MICA in red, MICB in orange, ULBLP3 in blue) compared with SA negative control (gray). C, D Corresponding quantification of percentages of CD107a + cells and pERK + NK cells in (A) and (B). E, F Plots and Pearson correlation analysis of NKG2D ligands stimulated percentages of CD107a + (E) and pERK + (F) NK cells with their reciprocals of EC 50 to release IFN‐γ. G IFN‐γ release (one representative experiment of total three independent biological experiments) of periphery human NK cells under the stimulation of soluble NKG2D ligands at 100 nM. Data information: Every dot in (C) and (D) represents one independent biological experiment. Data are mean ± SEM for biological triplicate experiments. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test).

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Negative Control, Two Tailed Test

A, B Representative raw (black) and low‐frequency drift corrected (red) tracked displacements ( X m ) (A) and corresponding histograms and Gaussian fits (B) of BFP. The corrected variance Var( X m ) was obtained from (A). C Var( X m ) is plotted versus reciprocal of suction pressure 1/Δ p and fitted by the motion blur model (Chen et al , ; Ju & Zhu, ). D The motion‐blur corrected variance Var(X) calculated from Var( X m ) is plotted versus 1/ k p, which is the BFP spring constant calculated from Evans model (Chen et al , ; Ju & Zhu, ). E Photomicrograph of BFP. An NK cell and an RBC with a probe bead attached to its apex were aspirated by two opposing micropipettes respectively. The Region of Interest (ROI) for tracking the edge of the probe bead as shown in dashed lines. F, G Representative force versus time curve for no adhesion (F) and force ramp (G). H Force‐dependent bond lifetimes of NKG2D and various ligands at 5 pN, 10 pN, and 15 pN. I Illustration of the retract phase (blue line, the slope of which is the loading rate) in an example event of BFP bond lifetime. J–N Scatter plot of loading rates (J) of NKG2D interacting with MICA (red, n = 1,499 bond lifetimes), MICB (orange, n = 1,847 bond lifetimes), ULBPL1 (green, n = 530 bond lifetimes), and ULBP3 (blue, n = 1,234 bond lifetimes) and their respective distributions and descriptive statistics for MICA (K), MICB (L) ULBP1 (M), and ULBP3 (N) interacting with NKG2D. The bond lifetimes are from at least 19 NK cell‐bead pairs of at least four independent biological experiments. Data information: Every dot in (H) represents one bond lifetime of NKG2D binding with corresponding ligand from at least 19 NK cell‐bead pairs in at least 4 independent biological experiments. The scale bar in the picture represents 5 μm. Error bars in (C, D, H, and J) represent mean ± SEM for at least three independent biological experiments. P = 0.1410 between groups (one‐way ANOVA) in (J).

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A, B Representative raw (black) and low‐frequency drift corrected (red) tracked displacements ( X m ) (A) and corresponding histograms and Gaussian fits (B) of BFP. The corrected variance Var( X m ) was obtained from (A). C Var( X m ) is plotted versus reciprocal of suction pressure 1/Δ p and fitted by the motion blur model (Chen et al , ; Ju & Zhu, ). D The motion‐blur corrected variance Var(X) calculated from Var( X m ) is plotted versus 1/ k p, which is the BFP spring constant calculated from Evans model (Chen et al , ; Ju & Zhu, ). E Photomicrograph of BFP. An NK cell and an RBC with a probe bead attached to its apex were aspirated by two opposing micropipettes respectively. The Region of Interest (ROI) for tracking the edge of the probe bead as shown in dashed lines. F, G Representative force versus time curve for no adhesion (F) and force ramp (G). H Force‐dependent bond lifetimes of NKG2D and various ligands at 5 pN, 10 pN, and 15 pN. I Illustration of the retract phase (blue line, the slope of which is the loading rate) in an example event of BFP bond lifetime. J–N Scatter plot of loading rates (J) of NKG2D interacting with MICA (red, n = 1,499 bond lifetimes), MICB (orange, n = 1,847 bond lifetimes), ULBPL1 (green, n = 530 bond lifetimes), and ULBP3 (blue, n = 1,234 bond lifetimes) and their respective distributions and descriptive statistics for MICA (K), MICB (L) ULBP1 (M), and ULBP3 (N) interacting with NKG2D. The bond lifetimes are from at least 19 NK cell‐bead pairs of at least four independent biological experiments. Data information: Every dot in (H) represents one bond lifetime of NKG2D binding with corresponding ligand from at least 19 NK cell‐bead pairs in at least 4 independent biological experiments. The scale bar in the picture represents 5 μm. Error bars in (C, D, H, and J) represent mean ± SEM for at least three independent biological experiments. P = 0.1410 between groups (one‐way ANOVA) in (J).

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Binding Assay

A, B Schematic diagram (A) and experimental setup (B) of BFP assay to characterize force‐dependent dissociation kinetics of NKG2D binding with different ligands. C Verification of the binding specificity of NKG2D with different ligands. D Representative force versus time curve for measuring single NKG2D‐ligand bond lifetime. E, F Force‐dependent bond lifetimes of NKG2D and various ligands at 5 pN, 10 pN and 15 pN (E) and full force spectrum (F). G Ratios of average bond lifetimes for NKG2D/MICA to that of NKG2D and other ligands. Data information: Every dot in (C) represents the adhesion frequency of one cell‐bead pair and the experimental data came from at least two to three repeated trials. Bond lifetimes in (E) and (F) (in which n = 1,505 for MICA, n = 1,852 for MICB, n = 531 for ULBP1, n = 1,241 for ULBP3) of all ligands with NKG2D came from at least 19 NK cell‐bead pairs of at least four independent biological experiments. Horizontal lines in (C), bars in (E), and data points in (F) represent mean values. Error bars in (C), (E), and (F) represent mean ± SEM. Source data are available online for this figure.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A, B Schematic diagram (A) and experimental setup (B) of BFP assay to characterize force‐dependent dissociation kinetics of NKG2D binding with different ligands. C Verification of the binding specificity of NKG2D with different ligands. D Representative force versus time curve for measuring single NKG2D‐ligand bond lifetime. E, F Force‐dependent bond lifetimes of NKG2D and various ligands at 5 pN, 10 pN and 15 pN (E) and full force spectrum (F). G Ratios of average bond lifetimes for NKG2D/MICA to that of NKG2D and other ligands. Data information: Every dot in (C) represents the adhesion frequency of one cell‐bead pair and the experimental data came from at least two to three repeated trials. Bond lifetimes in (E) and (F) (in which n = 1,505 for MICA, n = 1,852 for MICB, n = 531 for ULBP1, n = 1,241 for ULBP3) of all ligands with NKG2D came from at least 19 NK cell‐bead pairs of at least four independent biological experiments. Horizontal lines in (C), bars in (E), and data points in (F) represent mean values. Error bars in (C), (E), and (F) represent mean ± SEM. Source data are available online for this figure.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Binding Assay

A, B SMD snapshots of NKG2D dissociation with MICA (A) and ULBP3 (B) in the presence of force (directions are indicated by black arrows). C The force versus extension curves from the simulations shown in (A) and (B). Occurrence of the sudden extension changes are indicated in the shaded area and time points correspond with the snapshots in (A) and (B) are marked. D, E Zoomed‐in binding interfaces of NKG2D with MICA (D) or ULBP3 (E), corresponding with the configuration (shown as gray dashed box in (A) and (B), respectively). F Distance versus time curves for force‐induced H‐bond formation between indicated residues within NKG2D‐MICA binding interfaces. The dashed red lines represent H‐bonds whose distances are < 3.5 Å. Source data are available online for this figure.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A, B SMD snapshots of NKG2D dissociation with MICA (A) and ULBP3 (B) in the presence of force (directions are indicated by black arrows). C The force versus extension curves from the simulations shown in (A) and (B). Occurrence of the sudden extension changes are indicated in the shaded area and time points correspond with the snapshots in (A) and (B) are marked. D, E Zoomed‐in binding interfaces of NKG2D with MICA (D) or ULBP3 (E), corresponding with the configuration (shown as gray dashed box in (A) and (B), respectively). F Distance versus time curves for force‐induced H‐bond formation between indicated residues within NKG2D‐MICA binding interfaces. The dashed red lines represent H‐bonds whose distances are < 3.5 Å. Source data are available online for this figure.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Binding Assay

A–D Distance versus time curves for force‐induced binding residues within NKG2D and loop1 (A) and loop2 (B) in α1 domain of MICA and loop1 (C) and loop2 (D) in α1 domain of ULBP3. A‐D showed the minimum distances between NKG2D and two loops in α1 domain of MICA or ULBP3 during dissociation under mechanical force. E–I SMD snapshots of NKG2D dissociation with MICA 3A (E) and TAT mutants (F) in the absence or presence of force (directions are indicated by black arrows), their force versus extension curves (G), and their respective zoomed‐in (from gray dashed box and purple dashed box in (E) and (F), respectively) binding interfaces of NKG2D with MICA 3A (H) or TAT mutant (I). Extension transition points are indicated by circles in (G). J, K Distance versus time curves for force‐induced binding residues within NKG2D‐MICA residue 15 of MICA 3A (J) or TAT mutant (K) binding interfaces. E‐K showed that MICA mutants weaken stability of the intermediate states during NKG2D dissociation with MICA 3A mutant and MICA TAT mutant. The similar intermediate states are found for NKG2D dissociation with MICA 3A and MICA TAT mutants compared to MICA WT; however, there is only one new H‐bond formation between NKG2D K186 and backbone oxygen atom of MICA mutants, compared to 2–3 H‐bonds for MICA WT.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A–D Distance versus time curves for force‐induced binding residues within NKG2D and loop1 (A) and loop2 (B) in α1 domain of MICA and loop1 (C) and loop2 (D) in α1 domain of ULBP3. A‐D showed the minimum distances between NKG2D and two loops in α1 domain of MICA or ULBP3 during dissociation under mechanical force. E–I SMD snapshots of NKG2D dissociation with MICA 3A (E) and TAT mutants (F) in the absence or presence of force (directions are indicated by black arrows), their force versus extension curves (G), and their respective zoomed‐in (from gray dashed box and purple dashed box in (E) and (F), respectively) binding interfaces of NKG2D with MICA 3A (H) or TAT mutant (I). Extension transition points are indicated by circles in (G). J, K Distance versus time curves for force‐induced binding residues within NKG2D‐MICA residue 15 of MICA 3A (J) or TAT mutant (K) binding interfaces. E‐K showed that MICA mutants weaken stability of the intermediate states during NKG2D dissociation with MICA 3A mutant and MICA TAT mutant. The similar intermediate states are found for NKG2D dissociation with MICA 3A and MICA TAT mutants compared to MICA WT; however, there is only one new H‐bond formation between NKG2D K186 and backbone oxygen atom of MICA mutants, compared to 2–3 H‐bonds for MICA WT.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Binding Assay, Mutagenesis, Residue

A, B Abolishments of force‐induced binding residues by 3A mutations (MICA 3A, n = 526) and TAT mutations (MICA TAT, n = 580) impairs NKG2D’s catch bond with MICA WT ( n = 1,505) (A) and IFN‐γ release (B). C–E EC 50 (C) and IFN‐γ release of NK cells stimulated by indicated MICA mutants at a concentration of 11 nM (D) and 22 nM (E). Data information: Bond lifetimes in (A) of MICA WT and mutants with NKG2D came from at least 21 pairs of cells and beads of at least three repeated experiments. IFN‐γ release of NK cells in (B) was one representative experiment of three total independent experiments. Data points in (A) and (B), horizontal lines in (C), bars in (E), and data point in (F) represent mean values. Error bars in (A–E) represent mean ± SEM for biological triplicate experiments. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A, B Abolishments of force‐induced binding residues by 3A mutations (MICA 3A, n = 526) and TAT mutations (MICA TAT, n = 580) impairs NKG2D’s catch bond with MICA WT ( n = 1,505) (A) and IFN‐γ release (B). C–E EC 50 (C) and IFN‐γ release of NK cells stimulated by indicated MICA mutants at a concentration of 11 nM (D) and 22 nM (E). Data information: Bond lifetimes in (A) of MICA WT and mutants with NKG2D came from at least 21 pairs of cells and beads of at least three repeated experiments. IFN‐γ release of NK cells in (B) was one representative experiment of three total independent experiments. Data points in (A) and (B), horizontal lines in (C), bars in (E), and data point in (F) represent mean values. Error bars in (A–E) represent mean ± SEM for biological triplicate experiments. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Binding Assay, Concentration Assay, Two Tailed Test

A–C Plots and Pearson correlation analysis of reciprocals of EC 50 versus the force‐dependent in situ k off at 5 pN (A), 10 pN (B) 15pN (C). D Heatmap of force‐dependent in situ affinities A c K a of NKG2D binding with different ligands. E–G Plots and Pearson correlation analysis of reciprocals of EC 50 versus the force‐dependent effective in situ affinities A c K a at 5 pN (E), 10 pN (F), and 15 pN (G). H Comparison of corresponding Pearson coefficients between all NKG2D ligands in situ binding kinetics and ligand‐induced NK functions. I Detection range comparison in force‐dependent affinity of NKG2D and indicated ligands under difference force. Bars in different colors are the ratios of the affinities of indicated ligands divided by that of ULBP1. Source data are available online for this figure.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A–C Plots and Pearson correlation analysis of reciprocals of EC 50 versus the force‐dependent in situ k off at 5 pN (A), 10 pN (B) 15pN (C). D Heatmap of force‐dependent in situ affinities A c K a of NKG2D binding with different ligands. E–G Plots and Pearson correlation analysis of reciprocals of EC 50 versus the force‐dependent effective in situ affinities A c K a at 5 pN (E), 10 pN (F), and 15 pN (G). H Comparison of corresponding Pearson coefficients between all NKG2D ligands in situ binding kinetics and ligand‐induced NK functions. I Detection range comparison in force‐dependent affinity of NKG2D and indicated ligands under difference force. Bars in different colors are the ratios of the affinities of indicated ligands divided by that of ULBP1. Source data are available online for this figure.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: In Situ, Binding Assay, Comparison

Schematic diagram of NKG2D‐ligand combination and dissociation model. NKG2D binds and dissociates with multiple ligands at different initial on‐rates ( k on‐initial ) and off‐rates ( k off ). Ubiquitous mechanical forces in vivo regulate the disassociation of NKG2D and ligands. Probabilities of productive signals of different ligands binding with NKG2D when at forces of 0 pN, 5 pN, 10 pN, and 15 pN, respectively. Probabilities of output signals at 300s varied with force‐dependent off‐rates of the three ligands, MICA, MICB, and ULBP3. Off‐rates at different mechanical forces measured by experiments had been marked by specific symbols: pentagram, square, circle, and right‐pointing triangle represented off‐rates at 0 pN, 5 pN, 10 pN, and 15 pN, respectively. Contour plots showed probabilities of output signals at 300s produced by continuously variable initial on‐rates and force‐dependent off‐rates.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic diagram of NKG2D‐ligand combination and dissociation model. NKG2D binds and dissociates with multiple ligands at different initial on‐rates ( k on‐initial ) and off‐rates ( k off ). Ubiquitous mechanical forces in vivo regulate the disassociation of NKG2D and ligands. Probabilities of productive signals of different ligands binding with NKG2D when at forces of 0 pN, 5 pN, 10 pN, and 15 pN, respectively. Probabilities of output signals at 300s varied with force‐dependent off‐rates of the three ligands, MICA, MICB, and ULBP3. Off‐rates at different mechanical forces measured by experiments had been marked by specific symbols: pentagram, square, circle, and right‐pointing triangle represented off‐rates at 0 pN, 5 pN, 10 pN, and 15 pN, respectively. Contour plots showed probabilities of output signals at 300s produced by continuously variable initial on‐rates and force‐dependent off‐rates.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: In Vivo, Binding Assay, Produced